कोन्क्लुदिन्गोननिस्सुए?

All that seems to have happened, in this case, is that no one told you a thing. All you see or hear are suggestive actions and words –more so indicative of hostility over the ground. When such has persisted over a decade and straddling into the second it is really confusing because people may already be thinking they are carrying out a holy righteous war in which they suddenly find themselves. All that would have sounded so serious if not only that all people say about you are things like: - He wrote such and such in so and so place. - He ate so and so today. - He bought so and so in so and so place. - He borrowed so and so. - He has so and so in so and so account. - He looked for so and so job. - He visited so and so internet sites. - He discussed so and so with so and so (and all normal issues!) And such police-like, government-like, millitary like security-couched [DUBIOUS if you allow] methods are involving over a decade and half what might be added could be like: -is that how “they” have been going about issues? - Those supposedly involved or concerned in this particular issue know next to nothing about it! The Owerri incidence is a “ Carbon copy” of the real thing that triggered the problem. Here was someone with a job (seemingly group-approved) unable to be himself till something happened. For seven or so months – because of a strike- nothing happened because students were not around. Then it seemed as if all hell would let loose. Only that after many months of their endless agitation was it surmised :” this people are doing so and so because they believe so and so happened”- even where it did moreso when worse of such cases abound! The five or six eye-witnesses were each asked , in turn, about it and not even one of them knew if “that” did happen or not- LET ALONE THOSE WHO WERE TOLD OF IT. It was during this period that it became said more clearly that they had an issue raging(?or salary?) since the nineties! Just two days later, one of the very eye-witnesses to that issue in Port-Harcourt was encountered at the very institution it happened [IS GOD NOT INVOLVED?] The person’s phone number was obtained and lo and behold he of course didn’t know anything to say that would have warranted even the faintest such problems as some continue to this very day that they had. IF EYE-WITNESSES DID NOT KNOW ANY SUCH-again words?-WHAT OF THOSE WHO WERE ONLY TOLD ABOUT IT? And as a person directly involved I know that if anyone were to claim knowing the truth about the issue then such people would have been doing or saying differently and least of all, I should by now had a good paying job, my PhD, my good name, co-operating friendly neighbours etc etc. But to hear some are still carrying about sophisticated technology and miracle money and never failing to show “instantly and directly” a contradictory “they are powerful and they can vent mischief on you and nothing you can do about it” and bringing out their face to those they think are their frontline soilders – to “fight” and show hostile actions about an issue they know next to nothing about and think they are looking powerful to such people -and they would because they also do not know that they know next to nothing about the issue-but they are bringing insult to themselves and all because high rank and standing must necessarily go with high understanding. Who told who what stories is really not known. However it really becomes a disjoint to act as if one was in their secret discussions and presume anything whatsoever about their actions and words. But when they do connect, even faintly to me as regards their off-the-ground statements and the like then they are doing things concerning what they do not know about.